Asthma and its Relation to an Urban Atmosphere
by Kristle Grell
Increased asthma rates among Blacks attributed to an
urban atmosphere, not race.
Asthma rates have shown a sharp increase in the United
States over the last fifteen years, increasing by over 160% in children under
five years old. Due to the multitude of factors that are involved, the reason
for this rise is still unclear. Among the theories suggested are genetic
predisposition and environmental exposures, including allergens, both outdoor
(molds, pollen, etc) and indoor (dust mites, cockroaches, etc.), tobacco smoke,
and pollutants, especially ozone
and particulate matter
.1 Although asthma is not race-specific, it
is quite evident that Blacks are much more affected, compared to Whites. It appears
that this racial disparity is due to
differences in environmental exposures, for genetics solely cannot explain the
sudden rise within recent years. Considering that the majority of residents in
poor, inner-cities are disportionately Black, and that asthma is most prevalent
in these areas, it is highly possible that poverty and urban residence, rather
than race itself, are the underlying factors responsible for the differences in
asthma rates among populations.2
This hypothesis was tested by
Andrew Aligne, Peggy Auinger, Robert Byrd, and Michael Weitzman, in a paper
entitled, "
Risk factors in pediatric asthma: contributions of poverty, race, and urban
atmosphere
." In unadjusted analyses between black and white children, it was found
that Blacks had comparatively higher rates of asthma. However, after controlling
for numerous factors, it was shown that "black race was not a significant
correlate of asthma.
Compared with nonurban white children, urban children,
both black and white, were at significantly increased risk of asthma", more
so than nonurban black children.3 In a
similar fashion, results indicated that urban children, both poor and nonpoor,
had much higher asthma rates, compared to nonurban nonpoor children: urban
poor children did not show such elevated rates. These findings therefore
seem to indicate that the disparity in asthma rates among Blacks and Whites
has less of a correlation with racial or economic factors, and more to do
with their place of residence, considering that "all children living in an
urban atmosphere demonstrated an increased risk for asthma"4
Which aspect of urban living is responsible for increased
asthma rates?
A number of factors can be attributed
to elevated rates of asthma among urbanites. These include, but are not limited
to "passive smoking, outdoor pollutants, substandard housing, increased time
indoors, poor diet, decreased access to health care, and exposure to cockroaches."
5Even though the precise cause is currently unknown,
urban living itself, as an independent factor, rather than race, seems to
coincide with asthma being "a disease of modern civilization."
6 Furthermore, asthma rates among black Africans are
very low, and when it does occur, it is attributed to urbanization/industrialization.
Other evidence shows that individuals from countries such as India and Malaysia-countries
with low levels of asthma-who immigrate to countries with a high incidence
of asthma, such as England or Australia, seem to, within a few decades, develop
asthma rates similar to the country to which they immigrated, again pointing
to asthma as a "consequence of exposure to a modern, urban environment."
7.
Outdoor pollutants associated with asthma
Among the pollutants that contribute
to asthma are nitric oxide, ozone, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide,
which are commonly emitted from industrial processes and motor vehicles. In
poor, urban neighborhoods, such as North Brooklyn, "high-density industry
is located alongside residential housing, and thousands of diesel tractor
trailers rumble through the streets each day.8
However, many, including Michael Fumento, express doubts concerning asthma
and its correlation to environmental pollutants. In an
article
in the Investor's Business Daily, he argues that while asthma rates have
been sharply rising, outdoor pollutants have been decreasing.
Source: EPA
As further evidence, he points to a comparative study between
"asthma rates in highly polluted Leipzig, then East Germany, and the far
cleaner Munich in West Germany, which found asthma rates lower in the East."
9 According to Mr. Fumento, the number of asthma cases
has been rising, not because of outdoor pollutants, but due to indoor ones-a
result of better insulation in homes after energy prices surged during the
1970's. As a result, "with less fresh air circulating into these 'tighter'
homes, indoor pollutants such as cooking byproducts, pet dander, tobacco
smoke, hairspray, and insect droppings were more likely to build up."
10
According to the EPA, even though air
quality for the six principal
pollutants
has shown improvements over the past two decades, over 170 million tons of
pollution are emitted yearly in the United States.11
In addition, over 142 million people, including New Yorkers, reside in counties
whose air quality was deemed unhealthy in the American Lung Association's
State of the Air: 2002
, due to high levels of ozone and particulate matter.12
Of the 10.2 million American adults with asthma who live in counties with
ozone monitors, 7.6million-more than 70%-lived in counties that received
an 'F' rating in ozone pollution. Of the 2.6 million children living in counties
with monitors who had an asthma attack last year, 1.9 million-more than
70%-live in counties receiving an 'F' rating.
Source: State of the air:2002
Suburban and rural communities are not immune
Even though urban areas are known for
their high levels of pollution, suburban and rural communities are not immune.
Even without major industry or large populations, these areas can also encounter
pollution blown in from other communities.13
Atlanta, referred to as the New York City
of the South, is among the worst air quality regions in the nation. However,
this problem is not specific to those who live in the city-for the suburb
of Gwinnett
County
, according to the American Lung Association, beat even New York City as
being "one of the nation's worst air-quality offenders."14
This can be attributed both to the over 3 million registered automobiles
in the area, as well as Georgia's long growing season, producing pollen 10
months/year. These factors clearly have negative effects on asthmatics, but
considering that nothing can be done to prevent the environmental allergens,
pollution must be targeted. In the Journal of the American Medical Association,
the CDC reported a "'42 percent decrease in asthma-related emergency room
visits during the 1996 Summer Olympics.' For one whole month, the populace
of Gwinnett County altered travel methods and kept many automobiles off the
roads."15
Why are there counties in New York with high levels
of ozone, but low rates of asthma?
Data from the American Lung Association shows that all boroughs
within New York City received a grade of "F" when it comes to unhealthy amounts
of ozone. However, while the number of asthma cases in poor, urban areas
such as Brooklyn and the Bronx are increasingly high, other areas, including
Staten Island, Richmond County, (which has the worst air quality in the state),
possess comparatively much lower levels.16
This seems to suggest that environmental pollutants are not a sole cause
of asthma, with other factors of urban living, including indoor pollutants
(due to disparities in housing conditions) playing a further role.
References
1. EPA. "
Asthma and the environment: a strategy to protect children.
" May, 2000.
2. Andrew Aligne, Peggy Auinger, Robert Byrd, and Michael
Weitzman. "
Risk factors for pediatric asthma- Contributions of poverty, race, and urban
residence
."
3. Ibid
4. Ibid
5. Ibid
6. Ibid
7. Ibid
8. John C. LaRosa, MD. "
SUNY Downstate-Asthma: Letter from the President
".
9. Fumento, Michael.
EPA's Pollution-Asthma Theory is full of Bugs
." May 27th, 1997.
10. Ibid
11. EPA.
National Air Quality:2001
.
12. The American Lung Association. "
State of the Air:2002
."
13. Ibid
14. Joni Strandquest. Points North. "
Going from Bad to Worse
." August, 2001.
15. Ibid
16. Infoshare